| 
The
traveler of the '90s has often heard the claim that one is statistically
safer in an airplane than a car. In the subconscious mind of many
people, however, there lurks the rationalization that while you
can exercise much control over preventing a car accident (by your
quick reflexes or reaction to a situation, for instance), you can
do little in an airplane but sit helplessly at the mercy of unseen
faces piloting it. The thought is unnerving, to say the least.
To
put this fear into perspective, think back to the statistics. Of
1.3 billion flights worldwide in 1993, only 33 involved fatal accidents
resulting in a total of 1,020 airline deaths that year. Moreover,
in the average air accident involving fatalities, more than half
the people on board survive. Many of them are frequent flyers and
people who have paid attention to safety procedures. Emergency procedures
are designed to fulfill a specific purpose and even though you may
doubt a seatbelt's efficiency in helping you survive a plane crash,
it is wise to follow instructions. They mean a lot more than you
might suspect.
The
statistics and averages of air-travel safety as cited above can,
however, be misleading because situational differences affect your
chances of being involved in an air accident. The airlines of North
America, Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Western Europe are
believed to be the most consistently safe in the world, in that
order. Airlines in some other parts of Asia are a mixture of average,
poor and good. South and Central America have the lowest safety
score. This summarization is reflected in the amount that various
airlines pay for the insurance of their aircraft. In general, the
airlines of developing nations pay higher insurance premiums.
Another
factor that may influence safety records is whether a flight is
domestic or international. Statistically speaking, international
airlines have a better safety record than domestic airlines, probably
because they use bigger, newer planes and have to adhere to international
safety standards.
Jets
or planes that run on turboprop engines are fare more reliable than
those that run on piston engines. The former have improved aviation
safety records since the 1950s. Today, however, the focus is on
decreasing accidents caused by human error, as such accidents are
more common than technological or technical problems. In Britain,
for instance, commercial pilots are required to take an examination
in psychology, in addition to other qualifications, to obtain their
licences.
A
domestic flight that my daughter took within the United States recently
had to make an unexpected landing in Cincinnati's airport, from
which it had taken off 20 minutes earlier. Something was wrong with
one of the engines, the pilot explained calmly. Back on ground,
technicians surveyed the aircraft and decided to cancel the flight.
There
is also the fear of premeditated hazards. While hijacking is less
frequent in the 1990s, the idea of your aircraft playing pawn in
the propagation of terrorist activities can be nagging worry. One
midnight many years ago, I boarded a Bombay - Colombo flight. Just
as the plane was ready to take off, we realized that it was surrounded
by hundreds of dogs and commandos. We were made to evacuate the
aircraft in a matter of seconds and were taken to a lounge, from
where we watched the aircraft being towed away.

About
six hours later, at daybreak, the passengers were led to an open
ground where dogs sniffed at us. We then boarded the aircraft, where
stewardesses confirmed that a bomb had been found. We finally took
off around 7 a.m.
While
both the above incidents can be viewed as potential catastrophes,
they are also some indicators of the scrupulous adherence to security
rules by the authorities concerned. The passenger may never know
what actually went wrong, and it is this sense of not being in control
that has created an almost universal anxiety of being airborne.
Fear
of Flying
It
was once seated next to a veiled and bejeweled woman in the first
- class cabin. As our plane gained speed along the runway in readiness
for takeoff, the woman started to scream, her screams increasing
in proportion to the increasing velocity of the plane.
A
stewardess, who had already strapped herself to her seat, looked
on helplessly as the woman unlatched her seatbelt at the moment
of takeoff, despite my admonitions. I managed, however, to physically
keep her from leaving her seat.
As
soon as our plane had attained a reasonable angle, the air stewardess
rushed over to calm her down, with the help of a man seated nearby
who happened to speak the woman's language.
Aviaphobia,
or the fear of flying, is a common problem, even among those who
have never flown. International studies show that 30% to 50% of
flyers suffer from some degree of flying-related anxiety. Many of
them are not relaxed enough to read, sleep or eat during the flight.
Aviaphobia
can have many causes. Often, it is caused by the unfamiliarity of
flying and the strangeness of the experience. At other times, it
is linked to other anxieties such as acrophobia (fear of heights),
claustrophobia (fear of being in a confined space) and vertigo (dizziness
resulting from a brain disorder).
Symptoms
of aviaphobia include nausea, diarrhoea, frequent urination, dizziness,
trembling, headaches and sweating. When you experience such symptoms,
the first step in dealing with them is to recognize that they are
a natural reaction to an explainable phenomenon. Then try to concentrate
on pleasant thoughts in order to get your mind off unnecessary worries.
Sitting
in front of the plane reduces your perception of how steep an angle
the plane is moving or turning at, especially during take off, climb,
descent and landing. A study by the Harvard University School of
Public Health has also confirmed that the air in the front of a
jet has lower levels of carbon dioxide than that at the rear. High
levels of carbon dioxide can cause headaches and drowsiness.
While
alcohol might calm your nerves in an ordinary situation, it is best
avoided in large doses in an airplane as it ultimately works as
a depressant. A mild tranquillizer might help if absolutely required;
however, it should be taken only under medical supervision. Tranquillizers
are usually taken an hour or so before the flight begins.
|